Hi D community!
Sorry for being late. I’m here again, to describe what I’ve done during the fifteenth week of Symmetry Autumn of Code.
LLVM upstream changes: LLD D demangling
I didn’t work on the demangler patches but I touched on some other existing
ones, such as implementation of
DW_TAG_immutable_type on the LLVM core which
had some missing pieces and added tests. (See
I also added support for other demanglers other than Itanium on LLD linker. This included the freshly added D demangler along with Rust and other future demanglers added to LLVM core.
So now instead of:
app.d:16: error: undefined reference to '_D3app7noexistFZi'
You will have this:
app.d:16: error: undefined reference to 'app.noexist()'
This came along with my work on adding D demangler on the LLVM core. You can read more about this change, here.
Type name dumping and value dumping
I added D type kind mapping to type name for the rest of the built-in types.
I also have found the missing part to make value dumping working. I needed to implement two missing parts:
- A way to discover the bit size based on the D type wrapper type kind.
- A way to get the type information based on a type kind using
This way LLDB can understand if a certain type kind is built-in, has value, is signed, is integer, is scalar, etc…
So finally, I can print a simple runtime boolean value:
(lldb) ta v Global variables for app.d in app: (bool) app.falseval = false (bool) app.trueval = true
You can consult the source code for those changes here.
Expanding value dumping to other built-in types
Having this implemented, I now need to compare and check if the DWARF bit size
and encoding match a certain D type kind. The implementation of other types are
not yet pushed, since I faced a problem while adding logic to platform-specific
size types, such as
real is, according to D specification, platform-specific, I need to
accomudate the right bit size according to a certain target and discover the
right floating point encoding. This quite a challange because DWARF doesn’t
specify the floating point encoding. To try to understand why, I did a bit of
research about that, and found
this mailing list
thread from 2015 about distiguish different floating point encoding in DWARF.
Right now, there is no way and it seems there is no intention to distiguish target-specific floating point formats on DWARF, because according to them, this should be specified on the target ABI. But what if the ABI doesn’t specify this behaviour? We should at least have a way to distiguish IEEE interchangable format and non-interchangable formats, like 128-bit x86 SSE floating points.
Fortunately, we don’t have to worry much about this, since we don’t use 128-bit in any of D implementation, although our spec say:
real: largest floating point size available Implementation Defined: The real floating point type has at least the range and precision of the double type. On x86 CPUs it is often implemented as the 80 bit Extended Real type supported by the x86 FPU.
This is wrong, because, AFAIK, on x86-64 System V ABI, 128-bit floating point is the largest available, since AMD64 CPUs are required to have at least SSE extensions, which have support for 128-bit XMM registers to perform floating-point operations.
So, LDC and DMD generates binaries with System V as target ABI but uses x87 FPU
instead of SSE for
real, which means they are out of spec?
Anyway, according to Mathias and as I suggested, the simple way to do this is to hardcode this according the target triple and the DWARF type name, but I think this can be problematic for either when we support 128-bit floats or when the ABI doesn’t specify the floating point encoding format.
That said, I would like to have some thoughts on this, specially if someone knows if there is any special case for certain targets and how DMD/LDC/GDC interprets the D spec and target ABI spec.
What is next?
I plan to finish support for built-in type value dumping and hopefully start
implementing DIDerivedType which includes DWARF tags for
You can also read this on the D programming language forum, here, and discuss there!